• Chest · Mar 2014

    Once-Daily QVA149 Demonstrates Superior Improvements in Patient-Reported Dyspnea Compared to Tiotropium in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe COPD: The BLAZE Study.

    • Anthony D'Urzo, Donald Mahler, Vijay Alagappan, Karoly Kulich, Nicola Gallagher, Donald Banerji, and Heinrich Worth.
    • Chest. 2014 Mar 1;145(3 Suppl):405A.

    Session TitleCOPD QVA149 PostersSESSION TYPE: Poster PresentationsPRESENTED ON: Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 01:15 PM - 02:15 PMPURPOSE: Dyspnea, the most distressing symptom experienced by COPD patients, is not always adequately relieved by bronchodilator monotherapy. The BLAZE study evaluated the superiority of QVA149, a dual bronchodilator combining the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium, versus placebo and tiotropium for improvement in direct patient-reported dyspnea as assessed by the innovative self-administered computerized baseline and transition dyspnea index (SAC-BDI/TDI).MethodsThis multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled, 3-period, crossover study, patients aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to once-daily QVA149 110/50 µg, placebo or tiotropium 18 µg. Improvements were assessed by the total SAC-TDI score after 6 weeks.Results247 patients (mean age 62.8 years; FEV1 post-bronchodilator 56.1% predicted) were randomized; 77.3% completed the study. Patient-reported SAC-TDI total score was significantly improved with QVA149 compared to PB (p<0.001) and tiotropium (p=0.021). Least squares mean treatment differences between QVA-placebo, QVA149-tiotropium and tiotropium-placebo were 1.37, 0.49 and 0.88, respectively. The percentage of patients achieving ≥1 point improvement in SAC-TDI score was significantly higher with QVA149 (QVA 34.7%, tiotropium 24.9%, placebo 18.1%) compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR] 2.65; p<0.001) and tiotropium (OR 1.66; p=0.037). The percentage of patients showing any adverse event with QVA149 (35.0%) was similar to tiotropium (35.5%) and slightly lower than placebo (39.4%).ConclusionsIn the BLAZE study, QVA149 provided statistically superior improvements in patient reported breathlessness compared to placebo and standard of care tiotropium.Clinical ImplicationsLABA/LAMA dual bronchodilation with QVA149 has the potential to be a better choice of treatment for controlling breathlessness in the management of COPD.DisclosureAnthony D'Urzo: Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Forest Laboratories, Pfizer, Schering Plough, Grant monies (from industry related sources): GSK, Schering Plough, Methapharma, AstraZeneca, Merck Canada, Forest Laboratories, Novartis Donald Mahler: Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sunovion, and have served on Advisory Boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pearl, and Sunovion, Grant monies (from industry related sources): receiving grants for clinical trials from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Sunovion Tracy White: Employee: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Vijay Alagappan: Employee: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Hungta Chen: Employee: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Karoly Kulich: Employee: Novartis Pharma AG Nicola Gallagher: Employee: Novartis Horsham Research Centre Donald Banerji: Employee: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation The following authors have nothing to disclose: Heinrich WorthClinical trial results of QVA149, combination of two approved products indacaterol and glycopyrronium, will be presented, QVA149 is in the late stage phase 3 trials prior to approval.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…