• Chest · Mar 2014

    Influence of Different Spirometry Interpretation Algorithms (SIA) on Decision Making Among Primary Care Physicians.

    • Anthony D'Urzo and Xiao Ou He.
    • Chest. 2014 Mar 1;145(3 Suppl):459A.

    Session TitlePhysiology/PFTs/Rehabilitation PostersSESSION TYPE: Poster PresentationsPRESENTED ON: Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 01:15 PM - 02:15 PMPURPOSE: Spirometry is recommended for the diagnosis of asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in international guidelines and it may be useful for distinguishing asthma from COPD. Typically, the only data required for clinical decision making are the Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) and the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). Limitations of SIA promoted for adoption in primary care have been described [Can Fam Physician October 2011 57:1148-1152, 1153-1156.] This study examines how different SIA (one and two) may influence decision making among primary care physicians.MethodsData for this initiative were gathered from 90 primary care physicians attending standardized accredited (CFPC) workshops in Canada between 2011 and 2013. Physicians were asked to interpret nine spirograms presented twice in random sequence using two different SIA (as stand alone aids) and touch pad technology (remote audience response devices) for anonymous data capture and recording.ResultsWe observed important differences in the interpretation of spirograms using two different SIA. When the pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio was greater than 0.70, algorithm one lead to a "Normal" interpretation (82% of physicians) while algorithm two prompted a bronchodilator challenge revealing changes in FEV1 that were consistent with asthma; an interpretation selected by 90% of physicians. When the FEV1/FVC ratio was < 0.7 after bronchodilator challenge but FEV1 increased > 12 % and 200 ml, 72% suspected Asthma and 16% suspected COPD using algorithm one while 74% suspected Asthma or COPD using algorithm two. The absence of a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC decision node in algorithm one did not permit consideration of possible COPD.ConclusionsThis study suggests that different SIA may influence decision making and lead clinicians to interpret the same spirometry data differently.Clinical ImplicationsFurther studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of our findings, particularly how reliance on changes in FEV1 (after bronchodilation) to differentiate asthma from COPD may influence disease misclassification and day-to-day management.DisclosureThe following authors have nothing to disclose: Xiao Ou He, Anthony D'UrzoNo Product/Research Disclosure Information.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…