• J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Mar 2012

    Comparative Study

    Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patients.

    • Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi, Hege Linnerud Fredø, Bjarne Lied, Per Hjalmar Nakstad, Pål Rønning, and Eirik Helseth.
    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
    • J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar 1;72(3):682-90.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of surgery for odontoid fractures and to study surgical mortality, surgical morbidity, and long-term outcome in a large, contemporary, consecutive, single-institution, surgical series of odontoid fractures.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of all odontoid fractures treated by open surgery at our hospital during 2002 to 2009. The fractures were classified according to Grauer. Follow-up data, clinical examinations, and cervical computed tomographies were collected in 2010.ResultsThis study included 97 consecutive patients with a median age of 73.0 years. The incidence of open fixation of odontoid fractures in this population was 0.45 per 100,000, and the incidence increased with age. The fractures were classified as type IIA in 3 patients, type IIB in 63 patients, type IIC in 8 patients, and type III in 23 patients. Anterior fixation and posterior fixation were performed in 41 and 56 patients, respectively. Immediate postoperative neurologic status was unchanged or improved in 97% of the patients. None of the patients developed postoperative hematoma, wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism. Eleven patients underwent resurgery during the follow-up period; five had suboptimal reposition after the first surgery, one had suboptimal position of an anterior odontoid screw, two had rupture of fixation materials, and three developed pseudarthrosis. Overall survival (OS) rates after 1, 12, and 24 months were 96%, 84%, and 75%, respectively. Fifty-seven patients were available for follow-up evaluation with a mean time of 37 months. Radiologic follow-up showed definite bony fusion in 82% of the patients and uncertain bony fusion in 18% of the patients. Flexion-extension radiographs were obtained in 6 of the 10 patients with uncertain bony fusion; 5 of these were defined as stable (fibrous union) and 1 was unstable. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated increased odds of nonbony fusion in more displaced fractures (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.04-2.16; p = 0.04) and when using the anterior fusion technique (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.75; p = 0.02). There was no significant association between neck pain and fusion method (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.86). Patients treated with a posterior fusion approach had significantly more neck stiffness than patients who underwent fusion with an anterior odontoid screw (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.04).ConclusionsThe annual incidence of open fixation of odontoid fractures was 0.45 per 100,000 inhabitants, and the incidence increased with age. The median age at time of surgery was 73.0 years, and the surgical mortality was 4%. Increased odds of nonbony fusion were observed in more displaced fractures and after anterior screw fixations. There were no significant differences between patients treated with anterior screw fixation versus posterior wiring with respect to neck pain, but patients fused with a posterior approach reported significantly more neck stiffness.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…