• Eur J Surg Oncol · Dec 2011

    Clinical Trial

    Preliminary results of a new small-bore percutaneous pleural catheter used for treatment of malignant pleural effusions in ECOG PS 3-4 patients.

    • P L Filosso, A Sandri, G Felletti, E Ruffini, P O Lausi, and A Oliaro.
    • University of Torino, Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Via Genova 3, Turin, Italy. pierluigi.filosso@unito.it
    • Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;37(12):1093-8.

    BackgroundIn cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions(MPEs),the commonest procedure to treat them with palliative intention is talc pleurodesis (TP) which can be obtained with talc slurry (TS) using small-bore catheters(SBC)or with thoracoscopic poudrage. SBC use is therefore rapidly increasing. The aim of this paper is to present our preliminary TP results using a new percutaneous chest drainage system(UNICO®, Redax, Mirandola Modena, Italy).MethodsIn the period 1st March-20th of July 2011,seven consecutive ECOG PS 3-4 patients(4 females, mean age 73.2 ± 12.1 years),unfit for thoracoscopic talc poudrage, were enrolled in our study. All patients received many thoracentesis before the placement of a chest drainage(median thoracentesis number:4.42 ± 1.13).UNICO® was bedside placed in all cases and TS was administered through the drainage when the overall fluid amount didn't exceed 150-200 ml/24 h and the lung was correctly re-expanded at the chest X-ray control.ResultsThere were no clinical complications following the placement of the drainage: its placement was easy, safe and well-tolerated by all patients. The median chest tube stay, before TS, was 7.2 ± 2.7 days while the median chest tube stay after TS was 1.5 ± 0.7 days. A satisfactory radiological lung expansion was achieved in all cases; PL effectiveness and dyspnea relief were complete in 6 and 4 cases, respectively. No patients required any further thoracentesis.ConclusionsTS through UNICO® is safe and efficient. The drainage was well-tolerated by all patients, even in case of its long-term stay. We may conclude that bedside TS through this new small-bore percutaneous drainage should be proposed as a viable clinical solution for MPEs in ECOG PS 3-4 patients, unfit for a thoracoscopic procedure. Moreover, with this device, we believe that TS might be an accessible procedure for pulmonologists and oncologists too.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…