• J-E Bazin, A Attias, H Baghdadi, A Baumann, P Bizouarn, F Claudot, B Eon, F Fieux, C Frot, C Guibet Lafaye, O Muzard, A Nicolas-Robin, V Orjubin, M Otero-Lopez, C Pelluchon, J Pereira, F Roussin, B Vigué, L Beydon, and Membres du Comité éthique de la Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (ICARE).
• Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, place Lucie-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: jebazin@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 May 1;33(5):335-43.

AbstractIn the perioperative period, several potential conflicts between anaesthetists/intensive care specialists and surgeons may exist. They are detrimental to the quality of patient care and to the well-being of the teams. They are a source of medical errors and contribute to burn-out. Patients can become the victims of such conflicts, which deserve ethical reflection. Their resolution through analysis and shared solutions is necessary. This article seeks to analyse these conflicts, taking into account their specificities and constraints. In order to understand this context, it is important to consider the specificities of each group involved and the records of such situations. Several factors can prevent these conflicts, first and foremost the patients themselves and the quality of the care that is provided. Medical deontology aims mainly at preventing and resolving these conflicts. Generally speaking, the quality approach which is increasingly applied in health care institutions (involving declarations of adverse events, morbidity/mortality reviews, benchmarking, analysis and improvement of practices, etc.) also contributes to the prevention and resolution of disagreements. The teaching of communication techniques that begins with the initial training, the evaluation of team behaviours (through simulation training for example), the respect of others' constraints, particularly when it comes to learning, as well as transparency regarding conflicts of interests, are all additional elements of conflict prevention. Lastly, conflicts may at times be caused by deviant behaviours, which must be met with a clear and uncompromising collective and institutional approach. This article concludes by offering a standardised approach for conflict resolution.Copyright © 2014 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…