• Spine · May 2016

    Targeted Therapy for Low Back Pain in Elderly Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: A Cohort Study.

    • Kiyotaka Yamada, Toshio Nakamae, Takuro Shimbo, Toshikatsu Kanazawa, Teruaki Okuda, Haruhiko Takata, Takashi Hashimoto, Takeshi Hiramatsu, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Kjell Olmarker, and Yoshinori Fujimoto.
    • *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan †Ohta Nishinouchi Hospital, Fukushima, Japan ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan §Muskuloskeletal Research, Department of Medical Chemistry and Cellbiology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    • Spine. 2016 May 1; 41 (10): 872-9.

    Study DesignProspective cohort study.ObjectiveTo compare the novel treatment procedure with nonoperative treatment for low back pain (LBP) in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).Summary Of Background DataTreatment of LBP associated with elderly DLS is controversial. We developed a novel treatment procedure, termed percutaneous intervertebral-vacuum polymethylmethacrylate injection (PIPI).MethodsWe included patients with de novo DLS aged ≥65 years who had LBP with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of >50 for ≥6 months with intervertebral vacuum and vertebral bone marrow edema (BME) defined on fat-saturated T2-weighted or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcomes were evaluated using the VAS score and modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). As an objective measurement, we scored BME on magnetic resonance imaging.ResultsBetween August 2004 and July 2011, 109 patients underwent PIPI and 53 received nonoperative treatment. At 1 month, mean improvements in VAS scores were -55.3 (95% CI, -60.5 to -50.1) and -1.9 (CI, -7.7 to 3.8) and mean improvements in ODI were -22.7 (CI, -27.3 to -18.2) and -0.6 (CI, -6.6 to 5.4) for the PIPI and nonoperative groups, respectively. At 2 years, mean improvements in VAS scores were -52.2 (CI, -59.9 to -44.4) and -4.0 (CI, -10.9 to 3.0) and mean improvements in ODI were -20.7 (CI, -27.3 to -14.5) and -1.0 (CI, -7.7 to 5.7) for the PIPI and nonoperative groups, respectively. BME substantially decreased in the PIPI group compared with the nonoperative group (P <0.001) and correlated with VAS score and ODI improvements (VAS score: r = 0.502, P <0.001; ODI: r = 0.372, P <0.001).ConclusionPIPI improved treatment for LBP, with a sustained clinical benefit for at least 2 years.Level Of Evidence3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.