• Pediatric radiology · Aug 2002

    The abdominal radiographic series in children with suspected bowel obstruction--should the second view be abandoned?

    • Ursula M Hughes, Karen E Thomas, Bruce Shuckett, Alan Daneman, and D Stephens.
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. hughes_u@yahoo.com
    • Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Aug 1;32(8):556-60.

    ObjectiveTo determine whether the addition of a second (horizontal beam) view to the supine abdominal radiograph improves diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of paediatric bowel obstruction.Materials And MethodsThe abdominal radiographs of 72 paediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of bowel obstruction by 22 independent observers (radiologists, surgeons and emergency physicians) of varying experience. Evaluation involved initial assessment of the supine radiograph alone, followed by reassessment with the addition of an upright or decubitus radiograph.ResultsWhen observers evaluated supine radiographs alone, their sensitivity was 66%, specificity 72% and accuracy 70%. With the addition of the second view sensitivity was 78%, specificity 75% and accuracy 76%. The mean change in accuracy was 6% with no statistically significant difference between radiologists, surgeons or emergency staff.ConclusionsThe value of the routine second radiograph in the accuracy of diagnosis of bowel obstruction is limited, and its use should be restricted to selected cases in which diagnostic uncertainty persists.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.