• C Mann, C Béziat, Y Pouzeratte, G Boccara, G Brunat, B Millat, and P Colson.
• Département d'anesthésie-réanimation B, hôpital Saint-Eloi, CHU de Montpellier, France. c-mann@chu-montpellier.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2001 Mar 1;20(3):246-54.

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of a pain management quality assurance program (PQAP) after abdominal surgery. The means used were mainly based on the French Society of anaesthesiology's pain management guidelines.Study DesignProspective evaluation using a before after study design: two audits among surgical patients: a first one in 1997 before implementation of PQAP, and a second one year later.Patients And MethodsFirst, standards were defined including objectives about pain relief and patient satisfaction. After analysis of discrepancy observed between these objectives and the data of the first audit, a pain management program was introduced that included education of physicians, nurses and patients, systematic assessment of pain, organized pain relief protocols and implementation of modern analgesic technologies.Results201 consecutive inpatients were evaluated in the first audit, and 117 in the second one. Comparing the second audit with baseline, the visual analog pain scores decreased during the five postoperative days, and the rate of very satisfied patients increased (36% versus 26%). 43% of the patients were given a regular analgesic medication in 1998 versus 15% in 1997. 65% of medications were administered with an effective interval between doses versus 47% in 1997. Patient-controlled techniques were used in 28% of the cases in 1998 versus 9% in 1997.ConclusionThe PQAP provided an improvement in efficacy of postoperative pain management in our unit, with the help of the overall ward staff, but without requiring personnel specially qualified.

15 keywords...

hide…