• M Feriani, C Ronco, S Biasioli, L Bragantini, and G La Greca.
• Department of Nephrology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
• Kidney Int. 1991 Apr 1;39(4):711-7.

AbstractThe effect of differing dialysate and substitution fluid buffer types and concentrations on acid-base balance have not been assessed in patients treated with hemodiafiltration for ESRD. To determine bicarbonate, acetate, lactate and total buffer flux, mass balance studies were performed in patients treated with hemodiafiltration using four different combinations of dialysate and substitution fluids. Driving force for bicarbonate flux was assessed in all treatments. Bicarbonate flux depended on bicarbonate driving force and ultrafiltration rate. Bicarbonate flux was negative in all treatment combinations, even when the driving force was positive. Acetate flux was positive in all treatment combinations, but the net magnitude was small. Lactate flux, when lactate containing substitution fluid was used, varied with dialysate buffer employed during treatment. Overall buffer flux depended on the bicarbonate driving force, ultrafiltration rate, and varied with the type of substitution and dialysate buffer employed. The types and concentrations of buffer used in dialysate and substitution fluid have important effects on the acid-base balance of patients treated with hemodiafiltration. The long-term implications of different therapeutical choices in these patients is unknown.

16 keywords...

hide…