• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Intubation in otorhinolaryngologic surgery: propofol versus propofol-suxamethonium].

    • L Dominici, R Gondret, S Dubos, O Crevot, and P Deligné.
    • Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Tenon, Paris.
    • Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1990 Jan 1;9(2):110-4.

    AbstractThis study was carried out to assess the conditions of intubation in head and neck surgery when using propofol alone or associated with suxamethonium. Sixty patients were randomly allocated in two groups of 30. Group I was given 3 mg.kg-1 propofol and Group II 3 mg.kg-1 propofol immediately followed by 1.5 mg.kg-1 suxamethonium. All patients were premedicated orally with midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1, 0.5 to 1 mg atropine and 7 to 10 micrograms.kg-1 alfentanil, while a colloidal solute (Plasmion) up to 250-500 ml was infused. One minute after injection of propofol, lidocaine 5% was pulverized on the glottis and intubation performed. The mean time required for intubation was similar in both groups: 128 +/- 10 sec in group I vs 132 +/- 9.7 sec in group II. Thirty-five % of patients had to be considered as difficult to intube but the mean times in these cases were not statistically different: 169 +/- 14 sec in group I vs 175 +/- 13 sec in group II. Opening of the glottis was found to be better in group II than in group I (p less than 0.01) and bucking was more frequent in group I (p less than 0.01). Successful intubation was obtained after one attempt at a similar rate in the two groups. The haemodynamic variations consisted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure compared to the initial value but these variations were similar in the two groups at each time (2.3 and 5 min) from induction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.