• Annette Sofie Davidsen and Christina Fogtmann Fosgerau.
• The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark. Electronic address: adavid@sund.ku.dk.
• Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr 1; 95 (1): 61-8.

ObjectiveTo investigate general practitioners' (GPs') and psychiatrists' responses to emotional disclosures in consultations with patients with depression.MethodsThirteen patient consultations with GPs and 17 with psychiatrists were video-recorded and then analyzed using conversation analysis (CA).ResultsPsychiatrists responded to patients' emotional disclosures by attempting to clarify symptoms, by rational argumentation, or by offering an interpretation of the emotions from their own perspectives. GPs responded by claiming to understand the emotions or by formulating the patients' statements, but without further exploring the emotions.ConclusionGPs displayed a greater engagement with patients' emotions than psychiatrists. Their approach could be described as empathic, corresponding to a mentalizing stance. The different approaches taken by psychiatrists could represent conceptual differences and might affect fruitful interdisciplinary work. Psychiatric nurses' responses to patients' emotions must also be studied to complete our knowledge from psychiatry.Practice ImplicationsExperiences from training in mentalization could be used to develop physicians' empathic or mentalizing approach. As most patients with depression are treated in primary care, developing GPs' mentalizing capacity instead of offering didactic training could have a substantial effect in the population.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…