• J M Malinovsky, F Charles, O Kick, J Y Lepage, M Malinge, A Cozian, O Bouchot, and M Pinaud.
• Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes Cedex, France. jmmalino@chu-nantes.fr
• Anesth. Analg. 2000 Dec 1; 91 (6): 1457-60.

AbstractWe compared intrathecal ropivacaine to bupivacaine in patients scheduled for transurethral resection of bladder or prostate. Doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine were chosen according to a 3:2 ratio found to be equipotent in orthopedic surgery. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to blindly receive either 10 mg of isobaric bupivacaine (0.2%, n = 50) or 15 mg of isobaric ropivacaine (0.3%, n = 50) over 30 s through a 27-gauge Quincke needle at the L2-3 level in the sitting position. Onset and offset times for sensory and motor blockades and mean arterial blood pressure were recorded. Pain at surgical site requiring supplemental analgesics was recorded. Cephalad spread of sensory blocks was higher with bupivacaine (median level, cold T(4) and pinprick T(7)) than with ropivacaine (cold T(6) and pinprick T(9)) (P<0.001). Eight patients in Group Ropivacaine received IV alfentanil (P<0.01). Onset time (mean +/- SD) to T(10) anesthesia and offset time at L2 were not different (bupivacaine = 13 +/-8 min, 127+/-41 min; ropivacaine = 11+/-7 min, 105+/-29 min). Complete motor blockade occurred in 43 patients with bupivacaine and in 41 patients with ropivacaine (not significant). Total duration of motor blockade was not different. No difference in hemodynamic effects was detected between groups. No patient reported back pain. We conclude that 15 mg of intrathecal ropivacaine provided similar motor and hemodynamic effects but less potent anesthesia than 10 mg of bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery.

18 keywords...

hide…