• NeuroImage · Jul 2007

    Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging measures in patients with multiple sclerosis.

    • Eleonora Tavazzi, Michael G Dwyer, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Jordan Lema, Stefano Bastianello, Roberto Bergamaschi, Vittorio Cosi, Ralph H B Benedict, Frederick E Munschauer, and Robert Zivadinov.
    • Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
    • Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1; 36 (3): 746-54.

    AbstractDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been proposed as a sensitive measure of disease severity capable of detecting subtle changes in gray matter and white matter brain compartments in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, DWI has been applied to the study of MS clinical subtypes in only a few studies. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the validity of a novel, fully automated method for the calculation of quantitative DWI measures. We also wanted to assess the correlation between whole brain (WB)-DWI variables and clinical and MRI measures of disease severity in a large cohort of MS patients. For this purpose we studied 432 consecutive MS patients (mean age 44.4+/-10.2 years), 16 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and 38 normal controls (NC) using 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical disease subtypes were as follows: 294 relapsing-remitting (RR), 123 secondary-progressive (SP) and 15 primary-progressive (PP). Mean disease duration was 12+/-10 years. Mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was 3.3+/-2.1. Brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), gray matter fraction (GMF) and white matter fraction (WMF) were calculated using a fully automated method. Mean parenchymal diffusivity (MPD) maps were created. DWI indices of peak position (PP), peak height (PH), MPD and entropy (ENT) were obtained. T2- and T1-lesion volumes (LV), EDSS, ambulation index (AI) and nine-hole peg test (9-HPT) were also assessed. MS patients had significantly lower BPF (d=1.26; p<0.001) and GMF (d=0.61; p=0.003), and higher ENT (d=1.2; p<0.0001), MPD (d=1.04; p<0.0001) and PH (d=0.47; p=0.045) than NC subjects. A GLM analysis, adjusted for age and multiple comparisons, revealed significant differences between different clinical subtypes for BPF, GMF, ENT, PH, PP, T2-LV and T1-LV (p<0.0001), WMF (p=0.001) and MPD (p=0.023). In RR and SP MS patients, ENT showed a more robust correlation with other MRI (r=0.54 to 0.67, p<0.0001) and clinical (r=0.31 to 0.36, p<0.0001) variables than MPD (r=0.23 to 0.41, p<0.001 for MRI and r=0.13 to 0.18; p=0.006 to p<0.001 for clinical variables). The GMF and BPF showed a slightly stronger relationship with all clinical variables (r=0.33 to 0.48; p<0.0001), when compared to both lesion and DWI measures. ENT (R2=0.28; p<0.0001) and GMF (R2=0.26; p<0.001) were best related with SP disease course. This study highlights the validity of DWI in discerning differences between NC and MS patients, as well as between different MS subtypes. ENT is a sensitive marker of overall brain damage that is strongly related to clinical impairment in patients with SP MS.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.