• AJR Am J Roentgenol · Mar 2006

    Axial rotation of the lumbar spinal motion segments correlated with concordant pain on discography: a preliminary study.

    • Donna G Blankenbaker, Victor M Haughton, Baxter P Rogers, M Elizabeth Meyerand, and Jason P Fine.
    • Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Clinical Science Center-E3/311, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA.
    • AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar 1; 186 (3): 795-9.

    ObjectiveOne possible cause of back pain in patients with intervertebral disk degeneration is decreased stability of the motion segment. Axial rotations between lumbar spinal vertebrae can be measured noninvasively with CT. We tested the hypothesis that larger axial rotations are found in motion segments with disks that test positive for concordant pain, which is considered by some investigators to be a reasonable, accurate predictor of spinal instability.Subjects And MethodsBetween October 2002 and March 2004, all patients undergoing discography were evaluated for inclusion in the study, with the approval of the institutional review board. All patients in whom concordant pain was detected at discography were enrolled in the study. The patients were placed supine in the CT scanner on a table that rotated the pelvis 8 degrees clockwise and then counterclockwise with respect to the thorax. CT images were obtained with the patient in the two positions of rotation. An automated program calculated the amount of rotation between each lumbar vertebra as a result of the table rotations. Rotations were stratified by disk level and by disk classification (concordant pain, nonconcordant pain, no significant pain).ResultsWe recorded the axial rotations of 94 disks in 16 consecutive patients (10 women, six men; age range, 26-53 years) after two disks were excluded because of a previous fusion. There were 68 normal disks by MRI and discography, six disks with nonconcordant pain, and 20 disks with concordant pain. Rotation averaged 0.6 degrees for the normal disks, 1.4 degrees for disks with nonconcordant pain, and 1.8 degrees for disks with concordant pain. The differences were significant (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). Disks at L3-L4 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.2 degrees , whereas disks classified as normal or nonconcordant pain rotated on average 0.7 degrees (significant at p = 0.005). Disks at L4-L5 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.9 degrees , and those without concordant pain rotated on average 1.4 degrees (significant at p = 0.05). Disks with concordant pain at L5-S1 had an average rotation of 2.2 degrees , whereas disks without concordant pain had an average rotation of 1.5 degrees (marginally significant difference at p = 0.07).ConclusionConcordant pain at discography predicts increased axial rotation at a lumbar disk level.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.