• F F Brown, M E Robinson, J L Riley, H A Gremillion, J McSolay, and G Meyers.
• Dept. of Clinical and Health Psychology, P.O. Box 100165 HSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
• Cranio. 2000 Jan 1; 18 (1): 58-65.

AbstractThe purpose of this research was to employ a double-blind placebo control design of iontophoretically administered lidocaine to assess the test-retest reliability and validity of a magnitude matching procedure using a pressure algometer. In studies in the literature on assessment of pain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD), the pressure algometer has been found to be a reliable means of measuring pressure-pain threshold and a sensitive measure of treatment-response in the laboratory. However, previous research with this apparatus has not employed more sophisticated psychophysics. This study employs a magnitude matching psychophysical protocol to obtain a multidimensional pain report. Test-retest reliability over two occasions, 3-8 days apart, was found to be moderate for discriminability (r = .71, p < .01) but poor for response bias (r = .44). The validity study used iontophoresis as an anesthetic in a double-blind placebo and no-treatment control design. Although it was hypothesized that subjects in the anesthesia group would demonstrate reduced discriminability as compared with the control groups, no differences were found among the three groups on this measure. However, differences in response bias were found, with both the placebo control and no-treatment control groups differing from the experimental group but not from each other. Possible explanations and the implications of these findings are discussed.

29 keywords...

hide…