-
J Spinal Disord Tech · May 2015
Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome at a Minimum 2-year Follow-up.
- Suhel Kotwal, Satoshi Kawaguchi, Darren Lebl, Alexander Hughes, Russel Huang, Andrew Sama, Frank Cammisa, and Federico Girardi.
- *Department of Orthopedic surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO †MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ‡Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
- J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 May 1; 28 (4): 119-25.
Study DesignRetrospective case series.ObjectiveTo determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with a minimum 2-year follow-up.Summary Of Background DataMinimally invasive LLIF is performed through a lateral, retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach. This procedure is characterized by the use of a tubular retractor to minimize tissue damage and real-time neuromonitoring to ensure safe passage through the psoas muscle. To date, advantages of minimal invasive LLIF, compared with open procedures, has been limited to early postoperative outcomes and complications, with the longest mean follow-up duration of 22 months.MethodsA total of 118 patients who underwent minimally invasive LLIF with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were determined by using Visual Analog Score for the degree of pain (trunk or lower extremity), and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-12 scoring methods for patient function. Radiographic evaluations included (i) disk height; (ii) segmental coronal angulation; (iii) segmental lordotic angulation; (iv) Cobb angle; (v) cage subsidence; and (vi) fusion status. Data were statistically tested using either paired Students t test or Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Significance level was set at P<0.05.ResultsWe found that (i) the Visual Analog Score for pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and the physical components summary, but not the mental components summary of Short Form-12 improved significantly at the follow-up; (ii) disk height, coronal angulation, and lordotic angulation at each level and the Cobb angle were restored at the statistically significant extent; (iii) successful fusion was achieved in 209 levels (88%); and (iv) transient thigh pain was the most frequent complication seen in 36% of the patients.ConclusionsOur results support the efficacy of minimally invasive LLIF in improvements of clinical and radiographic features.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.