-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEffect of site of venous protamine administration, previously alleged risk factors, and preoperative use of aspirin on acute protamine-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction.
- Mark E Comunale, Andrew Maslow, Linda K Robertson, J Michael Haering, John S Mashikian, and Edward Lowenstein.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Louis Unversity School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110-2550, USA. comunale@slucarel.sluh.edu
- J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2003 Jun 1; 17 (3): 309-13.
ObjectiveTo determine whether the incidence of protamine-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction (PIPV) is influenced by central venous versus peripheral venous infusion of protamine and whether aspirin ingestion within a week of surgery would decrease the incidence of PIPV.DesignSingle-institution, prospective, observational, randomized trial.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.ParticipantsOne thousand four hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass procedures.InterventionProtamine neutralization of heparin by infusion pump via either central venous or peripheral venous route.Measurements And Main ResultsFive previously suspected risk factors (valve surgery, prior protamine exposure, history of pulmonary hypertension, fish allergy, and vasectomy), aspirin ingestion within 7 days of surgery, and demographic information were recorded. PIPV was defined as an abrupt increase in mean PA pressure of 7 mmHg or more with associated right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by observation of the right ventricle in the field and regional wall motion abnormality by transesophageal echocardiogram and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg). Data were collected via continuous strip chart recording. A total of 10 patients (0.6%) developed PIPV during protamine infusion. The incidents were similar with respect to the site of venous administration. Prior exposure to protamine was associated with a greater incidence of PIPV (odds ratio 6.9; p < 0.01). Other previously suspected risk factors did not achieve statistical significance. None of the 766 patients who ingested aspirin experienced PIPV as opposed to 10 of the 731 patients who did not ingest aspirin (odds ratio 0.08; p < 0.001).ConclusionsAlthough the site of venous protamine administration does not influence incidence of PIPV, aspirin ingestion within 1 week of surgery may decrease it. These data also confirmed other studies suggesting that previous protamine administration predisposes to this protamine reaction.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.