• J. Physiol. Pharmacol. · Sep 1993

    Comparative Study

    A comparison between the automatized impedance cardiography and pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography methods for measurements of stroke volume (SV) and systolic time intervals (STI).

    • G Cybulski, Z Miśkiewicz, J Szulc, A Torbicki, and T Pasierski.
    • Department of Applied Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
    • J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1993 Sep 1; 44 (3): 251-8.

    AbstractStroke volume (SV) and systolic time intervals (STI) were measured automatically using impedance cardiography signals (ICG) and compared with those obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography using the apex approach. The comparison was made in 9 healthy male subjects, mean age 24.9 +/- 12.2 years, using recordings of 10 heart cycles simultaneously obtained by the two methods. During measurements the subjects rested in the supine position. There were no differences between mean values of SV determined by the two methods as well as between mean values of ejection time (ET) (p > 0.8 and p > 0.9, respectively). The pre-ejection period (PEP) estimated by ICG was 22 ms longer than that determined by echocardiography (p < 0.001). The relationship between SV values measured by impedance cardiography (SVA) vs those calculated by echocardiography (SVE) was found to be close to the line of identity in the range of measurements. The regression equation for SV was: SVA = 0.784.SVE + 15 (r = 0.69, p < 0.001, SEE = 10.7 ml). We conclude that automatic determination of SV and ET from ICG signals provides results comparable in absolute values with those obtained by the pulsed wave Doppler ultrasonocardiography using the apex approach for subjects remaining in the supine position.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.