-
Acta Neurol. Scand. · Aug 2011
Clinical assessment of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus. Guide to interpretation based on observational study.
- R A Weerakkody, M Czosnyka, M U Schuhmann, E Schmidt, N Keong, T Santarius, J D Pickard, and Z Czosnyka.
- Academic Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Weerakkody@cantab.net
- Acta Neurol. Scand. 2011 Aug 1; 124 (2): 85-98.
ObjectivesThe term hydrocephalus encompasses a range of disorders characterised by clinical symptoms, abnormal brain imaging and derangement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. The ability to elucidate which patients would benefit from CSF diversion (a shunt or third ventriculostomy) is often unclear. Similar difficulties are often encountered in shunted patients to predict the scope for improvement by shunt re-adjustment or revision. In this study we aimed to update our knowledge of how key quantitative parameters describing CSF dynamics may be used in diagnosis of shunt-responsive hydrocephalus and in the assessment of shunt function.MethodsA number of quantitative parameters [including resistance to CSF outflow (Rcsf), pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure waveform (AMP), RAP index and slow vasogenic waves] were studies in 1423 patients with 2665 CSF infusion tests and 305 overnight intracranial pressure (ICP)-monitoring sessions over a 17 year period.ObservationsWe demonstrate our observations for typical values of Pb, Rcsf, AMP, slow vasogenic waves derived from infusion studies or overnight ICP monitoring in differentiating atrophy from shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus or acute hydrocephalus. From the same variables tested on shunted patients we demonstrate a standardised approach to help differentiate a properly-functioning shunt from underdrainage or overdrainage.ConclusionsQuantitative variables derived from CSF dynamics allow differentiation between clinically overlapping entities such as shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus and brain atrophy (not shunt responsive) as well as allowing the detection of shunt malfunction (partial or complete blockage) or overdrainage. This observational study is intended to serve as an update for our understanding of quantitative testing of CSF dynamics.© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.