-
- E Ferrari.
- Department of Neurology, University of Bari, Italy.
- Funct Neurol. 1991 Oct 1; 6 (4): 337-58.
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to discuss whether in the realm of diseases of the nervous system the concept of "dysfunctional" versus "organic" disorders is still useful. The knowledge on the Common Brain Stem System (CBSS) described by Hess is reviewed in order to underline its role as a control centre integrating all the homeostatic and adaptive nervous activities, and in this context, the nervous control of the cardiovascular system is examined, particularly in relation to higher nervous activities. The neurogenic syncopes are chosen as examples of the either "organic" or "dysfunctional" conditions whose semeiotic and pathophysiological distinctive features are analysed. In conclusion the distinction between "organic" diseases and "dysfunctional" disorders seems to be still justified, mainly for the nervous affections involving the homeostatic-adaptive properties of the CBSS.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.