• P Joshi and P Barr.
• Department of Neonatology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.
• J Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Feb 1; 34 (1): 74-8.

ObjectiveTo ascertain the current use of lumbar puncture (LP) and laboratory tests for possible or suspected sepsis by Australian neonatologists.MethodsA self administered anonymous response questionnaire.ResultsSixty-nine (73%) of 94 neonatologists responded. None performed LP routinely in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or asymptomatic term infants with maternal Group B streptococcus (GBS) colonisation. One (1.6%) performed LP in term infants with respiratory distress, and only 35 (51%) performed LP in preterm infants with suspected late-onset sepsis (LOS). Twenty-one percent did not perform LP on all preterm infants with RDS and septicaemia and 24% did not perform LP on all preterm infants with late-onset septicaemia. Sixty-six percent and 85% did not perform LP for laboratory evidence suggestive of sepsis in preterm infants with RDS and preterm infants with LOS, respectively. Forty-nine percent investigated asymptomatic term infants with maternal GBS colonisation.ConclusionsLumbar puncture and laboratory tests for possible or suspected sepsis are not used uniformly by Australian neonatologists. The presently available information in the scientific literature is ambiguous and systematic review and further scientific study are required to determine best practice guidelines.

21 keywords...

hide…