• Stud Health Technol Inform · Jan 2006

    Artificial neural network versus subjective scoring in predicting mortality in trauma patients.

    • Adrian Pearl, Reuben Caspi, and David Bar-Or.
    • Swedish Medical Center, Trauma Research Dept., Englewood, Colorado. USA.
    • Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006 Jan 1; 124: 1019-24.

    ObjectiveCurrent methods of trauma outcome prediction rely on clinical knowledge and experience. This makes the system a subjective score, because of intra-rater variability. This project aims to develop a neural network for predicting survival of trauma patients using standard, measured, physiological variables, and compare its predictive power with that obtained from current trauma scores.MethodsThe project uses 7688 patients admitted to the Swedish Medical Center, Colorado, U.S.A. between the years 2000-2003 inclusive. Neural Network software was used for data analysis to determine the best network design on which to base the model to be tested. The model is created using a minimum number of variables to produce an effective outcome predicting score. Initial variables were based on the current variables used in calculating the Revised Trauma Score, replacing the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) with a modified motor component of the GCS. Additional variables are added to the model until a suitable model is achieved.ResultsThe best model used Multi-Layer Perceptrons, with 8 input variables, 5 hidden neurons and 1 output. It was trained on 5881 cases and tested independently on 1807 cases. The model was able to accurately predict 91% patient mortality.ConclusionsAn ANN developed using pre-hospital physiological variables without using subjective scores resulted in good mortality prediction when applied to a test set. Its performance was too sensitive and requires refinement.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.