• Pain · Sep 2015

    Meta Analysis

    Predictors of the placebo analgesia response in randomized controlled trials of chronic pain: A meta-analysis of the individual data from nine industrially sponsored trials.

    • Lene Vase, Jan Vollert, Nanna B Finnerup, Xiaopeng Miao, Gary Atkinson, Scott Marshall, Robert Nemeth, Bernd Lange, Charlie Liss, Donald D Price, Christoph Maier, Troels S Jensen, and Märta Segerdahl.
    • aDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark bDanish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark cDepartment of Pain Medicine, University Clinic Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany dDepartment of Biometrics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA ePfizer Ltd, Global Innovative Pharma, Sandwich, United Kingdom fGrünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany gAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Biostatistics and Informatics, Gaithersburg, MD, USA hDivision of Neuroscience, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA iH. Lundbeck Pharma A/A, Valby, Denmark.
    • Pain. 2015 Sep 1; 156 (9): 1795-802.

    AbstractA large number of analgesics have failed to prove superiority over placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and as this has been related to increasing placebo responses, there is currently an interest in specifying predictors of the placebo response. The literature on placebo mechanisms suggests that factors related to patients' expectations of treatment efficacy are pivotal for the placebo response. Also, general characteristics of RCTs have been suggested to influence the placebo response. Yet, only few meta-analyses have directly tested these hypotheses. Placebo data from 9 industrially sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trials in 2017 adult patients suffering from chronic painful osteoarthritis (hip or knee) or low back pain were included. The primary outcome was pain intensity. Based on previous studies, we chose 3 expectancy-related primary predictors: type of active medication, randomization ratio, and number of planned face-to-face visits. In addition, explorative analyses tested whether RCT and patients' characteristics predicted the placebo response. Opioid trials, a high number of planned face-to-face visits, and randomization ratio predicted the magnitude of the placebo response, thereby supporting the expectancy hypothesis. Exploratory models with baseline pain intensity, age, washout length, and discontinuation because of adverse events accounted for approximately 10% of the variability in the placebo response. Based on these results and previous mechanisms studies, we think that patients' perception of treatment allocation and expectations toward treatment efficacy could potently predict outcomes of RCTs.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.