-
- Dietmar Tamandl, Matthias Paireder, Reza Asari, Pascal A Baltzer, Sebastian F Schoppmann, and Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah.
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. dietmar.tamandl@meduniwien.ac.at.
- Eur Radiol. 2016 May 1; 26 (5): 1359-67.
ObjectivesTo assess the impact of sarcopenia and alterations in body composition parameters (BCPs) on survival after surgery for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (OC).Methods200 consecutive patients who underwent resection for OC between 2006 and 2013 were selected. Preoperative CTs were used to assess markers of sarcopenia and body composition (total muscle area [TMA], fat-free mass index [FFMi], fat mass index [FMi], subcutaneous, visceral and retrorenal fat [RRF], muscle attenuation). Cox regression was used to assess the primary outcome parameter of overall survival (OS) after surgery.Results130 patients (65%) had sarcopenia based on preoperative CT examinations. Sarcopenic patients showed impaired survival compared to non-sarcopenic individuals (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.03, p = 0.011). Furthermore, low skeletal muscle attenuation (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.12-3.28, p = 0.019) and increased FMi (HR 3.47, 95% CI 1.27-9.50, p = 0.016) were associated with impaired outcome. In the multivariate analysis, including a composite score (CSS) of those three parameters and clinical variables, only CSS, T-stage and surgical resection margin remained significant predictors of OS.ConclusionPatients who show signs of sarcopenia and alterations in BCPs on preoperative CT images have impaired long-term outcome after surgery for OC.Key Points• Sarcopenia is associated with impaired OS after surgery for oesophageal cancer. • Other body composition parameters are also associated with impaired survival. • This influence on survival is independent of established clinical parameters. • Sarcopenia provides a better estimation of cachexia than BMI. • Sarcopenia assessment could be considered in risk/benefit stratification before oesophagectomy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.