• S P Lauermann, K Lienhard, J F Item-Glatthorn, N C Casartelli, and N A Maffiuletti.
• Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
• J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Apr 1; 24 (2): 285-91.

AbstractThe aim of this exploratory study was to verify whether the evaluation of quadriceps muscle weakness is influenced by the testing modality (isometric vs. isokinetic vs. isoinertial) and by the calculation method (within-subject vs. between-subject comparisons) in patients 4-8months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n=29) and total hip arthroplasty (THA, n=30), and in healthy controls (n=19). Maximal quadriceps strength was evaluated as (1) the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque during an isometric contraction, (2) the peak torque during an isokinetic contraction, and (3) the one repetition maximum (1-RM) load during an isoinertial contraction. Muscle weakness was calculated as the difference between the involved and the uninvolved side (within-subject comparison) and as the difference between the involved side of patients and controls (between-subject comparison). Muscle weakness estimates were not significantly affected by the calculation method (within-subject vs. between-subject; P>0.05), whereas a significant main effect of testing modality (P<0.05) was observed. Isometric MVC torque provided smaller weakness estimates than isokinetic peak torque (P=0.06) and isoinertial 1-RM load (P=0.008), and the clinical occurrence of weakness (proportion of patients with large strength deficits) was also lower for MVC torque. These results have important implications for the evaluation of quadriceps muscle weakness in TKA and THA patients 4-8months after surgery.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…