• Lasers Surg Med · Jan 1998

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of dermal and epithelial approaches to laser tissue soldering for skin flap closure.

    • D D Suh, I P Schwartz, D A Canning, H M Snyder, S A Zderic, and A J Kirsch.
    • Division of Pediatric Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
    • Lasers Surg Med. 1998 Jan 1; 22 (5): 268-74.

    Background And ObjectivePrior studies of laser tissue soldering (LTS) of epithelial skin have shown poor wound strength in the short-term; however, we hypothesize that greater tensile strength and healing properties will result from directing laser energy to the dermal aspect of the skin. The current study compares wound strength and histology in a rat skin flap model of epithelial and dermally applied LTS.Study Design/Materials And MethodsSkin flaps (2.5 x 4 cm) were raised and bisected on the dorsum of Sprague-Dawley rats. The center line of bisection was closed from a dermal approach by LTS (LTS-D, diode laser 15.9 W/cm2 + Columbia solder), the upper incision by epithelial LTS (LTS-E), and the lower incision by suturing (7-0 Vicryl). Wound skin strips (1-2 mm x 10 mm) were studied immediately (N = 14) and at 3 (N = 57), 7 (N = 31), and 10 (N = 28) days postoperatively and were subjected to tensiometric analysis. Histologic staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Mallory's trichrome methods were used to define wound architecture.ResultsNo wound dehiscences were noted in any group. Greater immediate tensile strength was noted in wounds closed by LTS-D (521 +/- 61 g/cm2) versus LTS-E (342 +/- 65 g/cm2); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .08). By 3 days, both LTS-D (476 +/- 55 g/cm2) and LTS-E (205 +/- 37 g/cm2) maintained their initial strength; however, LTS-D and sutured (436 +/- 49 g/cm2) wounds were stronger (P < .05) than LTS-E. At 7 and 10 days, LTS-D (2,433 +/- 346 g/cm2 and 3,100 +/- 390 g/cm2) showed superior tensile strength (P < .05) compared to both LTS-E (1,542 +/- 128 g/cm2 and 2,081 +/- 219 g/cm2) and suturing (1,342 +/- 119 g/cm2 and 1,661 +/- 115 g/cm2). Histologic analysis of LTS-D wounds at 3 days showed full-thickness tissue apposition, complete epithelialization, and minimal inflammation or thermal injury. At 7 days, solder was present in the wounds. In contrast, LTS-E wounds at 3 days displayed lack of epithelialization secondary to thermal injury and partial-thickness tissue apposition. However by 7 days, epithelialization was complete with moderate scarring, and no solder was seen. Sutured samples appeared similar to LTS-D, except for poorer tissue apposition at the hypodermis.ConclusionOur results show that skin flap wound healing after dermal LTS is superior to epithelial LTS and emphasizes the importance of site specificity in the utilization of this operative technique in reconstructive surgery.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…