• J Randall Curtis.
• Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA. jrc@u.washington.edu
• Resp Care. 2002 Apr 1; 47 (4): 496-505; discussion 505-7.

AbstractIn the critical care setting, usually the most important outcome is survival. However, this is not the only important outcome of critical care. There are increasing data that the patient's quality of life and functional status can be affected long after an intensive care unit stay, and some data suggest that mechanical ventilation strategies could influence those outcomes. Critical care clinicians' decisions regarding mechanical ventilation and related treatments such as level of sedation might have more profound and far-reaching residual effects than has been previously recognized. To deliver effective, cost-effective, and patient-centered care, critical-care clinicians must consider outcomes other than survival. These outcomes include such diverse concepts as quality of life, functional status, and neuropsychological function. This review addresses theoretical and practical challenges to measuring and interpreting those other outcomes.

11 keywords...

hide…