• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. · Jun 2009

    Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates?

    • Kimberly D Gregory, Moshe Fridman, Sonal Shah, and Lisa M Korst.
    • Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns Allen Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    • Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009 Jun 1; 200 (6): 681.e1-7.

    ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to propose a new measure of ideal childbirth outcome, based on the proportion of women delivering without maternal or newborn childbirth morbidity.Study DesignUsing the 2002 California discharge dataset, we calculated rates of childbirth complications among women with singleton, term deliveries, stratified by pregnancy risk status, method of delivery, and parity. An ideal delivery (ID) was defined as a delivery without any complications. The distribution of hospital-level ID rates was calculated for laboring women stratified by parity.ResultsAmong 382,276 women, the ID rate was 78.5%. Rates, type, and severity of complications varied by risk group (high vs low risk), parity, delivery method, and across hospitals. Complications in childbirth were not rare; approximately 22% of deliveries had at least 1 complication. Women who delivered vaginally and multiparous women were more likely to have an ideal delivery.ConclusionThe ID rate is a simple hospital-level measure of childbirth outcome that is easy to calculate and interpret.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.