• J Spinal Disord Tech · May 2015

    Assessment of rib hump deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with or without costoplasty using the double rib contour sign.

    • Marios G Lykissas, Vivek Sharma, Viral V Jain, and Alvin H Crawford.
    • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 May 1; 28 (4): 134-9.

    Study DesignLevel III-therapeutic study.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of costoplasty in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery improved correction of the rib hump deformity.BackgroundTrunk deformity is comprised of vertebral rotation, posterior vertebral element, and rib deformities. Surgical correction of the rotational deformity has been performed by segmental spinal instrumentation with vertebral derotation, but complete correction of the rib hump by derotation is rarely achieved.MethodsA multicenter registry database for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was reviewed with the inclusion criteria of Lenke type I curves treated with posterior spinal fusion with or without costoplasty, instrumented with pedicle screws or hybrid constructs, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The first group (group I) was treated with pedicle screws, direct vertebral rotation, and no costoplasty, whereas the second group (group II) was treated with pedicle screws, vertebral rotation, and costoplasty. The rib index (RI), calculated from the double rib contour sign, and Cobb angle were measured radiographically and compared between groups.ResultsThe groups comprised 36 subjects in group I and 40 subjects in group II. The mean preoperative Cobb angles for groups I and II were 49.7 and 49.8 degrees, respectively, whereas the mean postoperative Cobb angles were 10.2 and 10.9 degrees, respectively. There was no difference in preoperative and postoperative values when comparing both groups (P=0.48 and 0.96, respectively). Before spine surgery, RI for groups I and II was 1.61 and 1.80, respectively. Postoperatively, the rib indices were 1.39 for group I and 1.29 for group II. These differences were found to be statistically significant (P=0.002 and 0.006, respectively). The amounts of correction of RI were 0.23 and 0.51 for groups I and II, respectively. This difference was found to be statistically significant (P<0.0001). The correction percentages were 13.7% and 28.3%, respectively. This difference was also found to be statistically significant (P<0.0001).ConclusionsCostoplasty combined with pedicle screws and vertebral derotation may significantly improve rib hump deformity as opposed to pedicle screws and vertebral derotation alone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.