• Wiad. Lek. · Jan 2002

    [Methodologic difficulties in measuring patient satisfaction--discrepancy coming from formulating questions].

    • Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Agnieszka Borzuchowska, and Ryszard Grebowski.
    • Zakładu Medycyny Rodzinnej i Pielegniarstwa Srodowiskowego Akademii Medycznej w Białymstoku. marcinek@amb.edu.pl
    • Wiad. Lek. 2002 Jan 1; 55 Suppl 1: 335-40.

    AbstractReports concerning methodology of studies on patients' satisfaction suggest that the way questions are composed may have significant effect on the received answers. For example responses to closed-ended questions are usually positive, while in contrast, the responses to open-ended questions tend to be negative. This is described as "leniency effect". The aim of the present study was to compare the difference in patients' answers to open and closed questions in a survey on patients' satisfaction with family doctor services. The study was carried out in two general practices in Białystok, Poland and participants were randomly chosen from the patients' lists of their physicians. The survey was conducted by the technique of mailed questionnaire. Of the total 1000 questionnaires sent out, 579 were filled in and returned, and 560 were eligible for further analysis. The results show the discrepancy between the rating given by patients in a five-grade scale and their own answers to open questions. Among 216 individuals grading family doctor's care as fairly good in an answer to a closed question, 42 persons (19.4%) used phrases expressing negative feelings in an answer to an open question asking for justification of their opinion. Most frequently negative comments were related to short time of consultation, difficulty with obtaining referral to a specialist and lack of holistic approach to a patient. The results of our study suggest that questionnaires are not sufficiently precise tools in a complex evaluation of doctors' care by their patients. In practice this may mean that questionnaire surveys, which are often used because of the ease of administration, may require to be complemented or replaced by other more qualitative research tools, such as in depth interviews and open questions.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…