• N Munoz-Bongrand, P Cattan, C de Chaisemartin, H Bothereau, I Honigman, and E Sarfati.
• Service de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Université Paris VII, France.
• Ann Chir. 2003 Jul 1; 128 (6): 373-8.

Aim Of The StudyTo report the results of oesogastric resections extended to surrounding organs following caustic ingestion, and to precise indications for resection and results of reconstruction.Patients And MethodsFrom 1988 to 2001, 12 patients underwent oesophago-gastrectomy, extended to duodenum and pancreatic head (n = 6), jejunum (n = 4), colon (n = 2), spleen (n = 2) or pancreatic body (n = 1). Early morbidity and mortality, specificities of reconstruction, and quality of oral feeding were assessed retrospectively.ResultsMean intensive care unit stay was 50 days (range: 16-152 days). All patients developed complications. Six patients were reoperated for secondary extension of caustic burns, mainly to colon (n = 4), small bowel (n = 2) and pancreas (n = 2). Three patients died on postoperative days 17, 20, and 130. Secondarily, eight patients (75%) underwent a substernal right ileocoloplasty. Six patients (50%) survived initial resection, and esophageal reconstruction. After a mean follow-up of 35 months (range: 7-87 months), four patients (33%) eat normally.ConclusionsAfter caustic burn, oesogastric resections extended to surrounding organs are associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, return of normal oral feeding can be expected in 33% of cases. Secondary extension of caustic burns to adjacent organs is a common eventuality, and may lead to prompt reintervention. Massive injury to small bowel or colon may compromise digestive function or secondary esophageal reconstruction, and thus may be the reasonable limit for resection.

26 keywords...

hide…