• David J Kennedy, Andrew Engel, D Scott Kreiner, Devi Nampiaparampil, Belinda Duszynski, and John MacVicar.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA.
• Pain Med. 2015 Aug 1; 16 (8): 1500-18.

ObjectiveTo assess the validity of fluoroscopically guided diagnostic intra-articular injections of local anesthetic and effectiveness of intra-articular steroid injections in treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain.DesignSystematic review.InterventionsTen reviewers independently assessed 45 publications on diagnostic validity or effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided intra-articular SIJ injections.Outcome MeasuresFor diagnostic injections, the primary outcome was validity; for therapeutic injections, analgesia. Secondary outcomes were also described.ResultsOf 45 articles reviewed, 39 yielded diagnostic data on physical exam findings, provocation tests, and SIJ injections for diagnosing SIJ pain, and 15 addressed therapeutic effectiveness. When confirmed by comparative local anesthetic blocks with a high degree of pain relief, no single physical exam maneuver predicts response to diagnostic injections. When at least three physical exam findings are present, sensitivity, and specificity increases significantly. The prevalence of SIJ pain is likely 20-30% among patients that have suspected SIJ pain based on history and physical examination. This estimate may be higher in certain subgroups such as the elderly and fusion patients. Two randomized controlled trials and multiple observational studies supported the effectiveness of therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections.ConclusionsBased on this literature, it is unclear whether image-guided intra-articular diagnostic injections of local anesthetic predict positive responses to therapeutic agents. The overall quality of evidence is moderate for the effectiveness of therapeutic SIJ injections.Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

24 keywords...

hide…