• Lynn R Webster, Brad Bath, Robert A Medve, Tonya Marmon, and Gregory J Stoddard.
• Lifetree Clinical Research, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA. lynnw@lifetreepain.com
• Pain Med. 2012 Jun 1; 13 (6): 790-801.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and abuse potential of different formulations of oxycodone.DesignThe participants completed an 8-day, placebo-controlled trial with four phases: naloxone challenge, double-blind drug discrimination, double-blind abuse liability, and discontinuation.SubjectsNineteen healthy, male, recreational drug abusers participated in this study.InterventionsThe participants were administered different doses and formulations of oxycodone (40 mg immediate release [IR], 40 mg controlled release [CR], crushed 40 mg CR, and 80 mg CR) to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters and ratings of drug liking and high.Outcome MeasuresPharmacokinetic parameters were determined over a 12-hour dosing interval. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoints were two questions from the Drug Effects Questionnaire ("Do you like the drug?" and "How high are you now?").ResultsMaximal plasma concentrations and area under the curve determinations were similar for 40 mg IR, crushed 40 mg CR, and 80 mg CR, which were all greater than 40 mg CR. For drug liking and high, the maximal effect and area under the effect curve were similar for the three formulations, which were all greater than 40 mg CR. The dose required to produce comparable reports of drug liking and high was approximately twofold greater for the CR vs IR formulation. When the 40 mg CR tablet was crushed, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile was similar to the 40 mg IR formulation. Adverse events were consistent with opioid administration.ConclusionsIntact, orally administered oxycodone CR produced less drug liking and high than IR oxycodone, and required approximately twofold greater doses to produce subjective effects comparable to IR oxycodone.Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

23 keywords...

hide…