• A Melgarejo Urendez, M D Bernat Adell, and P Lorente García.
• Servicio Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario General de Castellón, Castellón, España.
• Enferm Intensiva. 2014 Apr 1; 25 (2): 58-64.

IntroductionMobilization entails a risk for critically ill patients. It is therefore important to design and apply the tools to detect any safety lapses and to improve the quality of patient healthcare.ObjectivesTo identify which adverse events (AE) are related to interhospital transfer of assisted patients and how enabling a protocol may prevent potential risks.Material And MethodDescriptive, observational study. We analyzed 110 transfers during morning shift in an Intensive Care Unit at a reference hospital between January and March 2011. Variables related to underlying security factors were collected.ResultsThe average transfer time was 37.16 minutes. 61.82% of the transfers were carried out on a scheduled basis. An 18.18% of AE were detected. In both cases, desaturation and hemodynamic instability made up to 2.7% of the cases. 5.5% of the cases were underlying factors related to monitoring during transfer, and those related to ventilation during transfer accounted for 2.7%. Not having all materials by the stretcher constituted 1.8%. We detected 31 AE for non-compliance with the protocol, that being a 27.15% of all transfers.ConclusionsBefore each hospital transfer, a risk-benefit assessment is recommended in order to avoid potential alterations in the patient's pathophysiologic condition. Both the protocol and the safety checklist are key to detect underlying factors and improve security during interhospital transfers.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEEIUC. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…