• Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy, Jerrold Lerman, Victoria I Okhomina, and Alan D Penman.
• University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State Street, Jackson, MS 39216. Electronic address: msathyamoorthy@umc.edu.
• J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep 1; 33: 266-72.

Study ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize the current practice patterns with cuffed tracheal tubes (CTT) in neonates, infants, and children among members of the Society of Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA).Design And SettingAn electronic mail survey was distributed using Survey Monkey to members of SPA between December 2013 and February 2014. Each member was permitted one response.Patients/Intervention/MeasurementsNot applicable as this is a practice survey study.Main ResultsA total of 805 (28%) of the 2901 members of the SPA responded. Of the respondents, 88% were from the US, 83% were fellowship trained, 82% practiced pediatric anesthesia >50% of the time, and 65% practiced in academic centers. Eighty-five percent used CTT >50% of the time in children >2 years and 60% used CTT in full-term neonates >50% of the time. Twenty-nine percent reported always using CTT whereas 5% reported never using CTT. Those in practice <5 years, who were fellowship trained or in academic practice used CTT more often in neonates compared with those in practice >20 years, not fellowship trained or in private practice (P< .0001, P= .0003 and P= .0005, respectively). The most common reason for avoiding CTT was concern about post-extubation stridor (39%). Almost 70% of respondents accept the TT if it passes the subglottis without resistance and has a leak at 15 to 20 cmH2O. More than 60% of respondents do not monitor cuff pressures in CTT.ConclusionA majority of SPA members routinely use CTT in neonates, infants and children.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…