• N. Engl. J. Med. · Sep 2016

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol for COPD in Clinical Practice.

    • Jørgen Vestbo, David Leather, Nawar Diar Bakerly, John New, J Martin Gibson, Sheila McCorkindale, Susan Collier, Jodie Crawford, Lucy Frith, Catherine Harvey, Henrik Svedsater, Ashley Woodcock, and Salford Lung Study Investigators.
    • From the Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (J.V., A.W.), Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (J.M.G.), and NIHR Clinical Research Network Greater Manchester (S.M.), Manchester; Global Respiratory Franchise (D.L.) and Respiratory Research and Development (S.C., J.C., L.F., H.S.), GlaxoSmithKline UK, Brentford; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (N.D.B., J.N., J.M.G.), NorthWest EHealth (J.N., J.M.G.), and NHS Salford Clinical Commissioning Group (S.M.), Salford; and Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Safety Evaluation and Risk Management, GlaxoSmithKline UK, Uxbridge (C.H.) - all in the United Kingdom.
    • N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 Sep 29; 375 (13): 1253-60.

    AbstractBackground Evidence for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) comes from closely monitored efficacy trials involving groups of patients who were selected on the basis of restricted entry criteria. There is a need for randomized trials to be conducted in conditions that are closer to usual clinical practice. Methods In a controlled effectiveness trial conducted in 75 general practices, we randomly assigned 2799 patients with COPD to a once-daily inhaled combination of fluticasone furoate at a dose of 100 μg and vilanterol at a dose of 25 μg (the fluticasone furoate-vilanterol group) or to usual care (the usual-care group). The primary outcome was the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations among patients who had had an exacerbation within 1 year before the trial. Secondary outcomes were the rates of primary care contact (contact with a general practitioner, nurse, or other health care professional) and secondary care contact (inpatient admission, outpatient visit with a specialist, or visit to the emergency department), modification of the initial trial treatment for COPD, and the rate of exacerbations among patients who had had an exacerbation within 3 years before the trial, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. Results The rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was significantly lower, by 8.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 15.2), with fluticasone furoate-vilanterol therapy than with usual care (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the annual rate of COPD-related contacts to primary or secondary care. There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of the first moderate or severe exacerbation and the first severe exacerbation in the time-to-event analyses. There were no excess serious adverse events of pneumonia in the fluticasone furoate-vilanterol group. The numbers of other serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions In patients with COPD and a history of exacerbations, a once-daily treatment regimen of combined fluticasone furoate and vilanterol was associated with a lower rate of exacerbations than usual care, without a greater risk of serious adverse events. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Salford Lung Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01551758 .).

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.