• Andrew B Rosenkrantz and Ankur M Doshi.
• Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016 USA. Electronic address: Andrew.Rosenkrantz@nyumc.org.
• Clin Imaging. 2016 May 1; 40 (3): 531-4.

PurposeTo assess information regarding radiology practices on public transparency Web sites.MethodsEight Web sites comparing radiology centers' price and quality were identified. Web site content was assessed.ResultsSix of eight Web sites reported examination prices. Other reported information included hours of operation (4/8), patient satisfaction (2/8), American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation (3/8), on-site radiologists (2/8), as well as parking, accessibility, waiting area amenities, same/next-day reports, mammography follow-up rates, examination appropriateness, radiation dose, fellowship-trained radiologists, and advanced technologies (1/8 each).ConclusionTransparency Web sites had a preponderance of price (and to a lesser extent service quality) information, risking fostering price-based competition at the expense of clinical quality.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…