• Neurological research · Jun 2015

    Comparative Study

    Reliability of the witness descriptions of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic attacks: a comparative analysis.

    • Aleksandar J Ristić, Maja Drašković, Zoran Bukumirić, and Dragoslav Sokić.
    • Neurol. Res. 2015 Jun 1; 37 (6): 560-2.

    BackgroundThe diagnosis of epilepsy primarily depends on description of the observed seizure. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of witness' description among groups with different medical education.MethodsA group of 44 respondents (15 laymen, 15 medical students, and 14 doctors at neurology residency program) were shown video footages of focal epileptic seizure (ES) with secondary generalization and psychogenic non-epileptic seizure (PNES) of the same patient. The ability to describe ES and PNES characteristics, to estimate duration of seizures, and to detect of accurate seizure type was evaluated using a questionnaire. For the analysis of primary data obtained from questionnaires, we used descriptive statistical methods and methods for testing statistical hypotheses.ResultsThe sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for accurate recognition of ES are different in the examined groups (laymen Sn  =  53.3%, Sp  =  33.3%; medical students Sn  =  100%, Sp  =  13.3%; neurology residents Sn  =  100%, Sp  =  71.4%). Evaluated duration of PNES and ES do not differ between examined groups. The impression that ES and PNES are distinct events is reciprocal for medical students and neurology residents, but not in laymen group. Neurology residents notice the essential characteristics of ES in high percentage.ConclusionAccurate classification of the attacks is associated with the observers' level of medical knowledge. Witnesses with specific, neurological knowledge with higher probability, compared to the laity and medical students, differentiate ES from PNES.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…