• J Clin Anesth · Dec 2016

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    A comparison of 3 ventilation strategies in children younger than 1 year using a Proseal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized controlled trial.

    • T Wesley Templeton, Lauren K Hoke, Leah B Templeton, Douglas G Ririe, Danielle M Rose, and Yvon F Bryan.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009. Electronic address: ttemplet@wakehealth.edu.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec 1; 35: 502-508.

    Study ObjectiveTo determine quantitative differences in several routinely measured ventilation parameters using a standardized anesthetic technique and 3 different ventilation modalities in patients younger than 1 year with a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA).DesignRandomized prospective study.SettingTertiary care pediatric hospital.PatientsThirty-nine American Society Anesthesiologists classifications 1 to 2, pediatric patients younger than 1 year.InterventionsThree different ventilation strategies (spontaneous ventilation [SV], pressure support ventilation [PSV], and pressure-controlled ventilation [PCV]) were randomly applied to patients who underwent a standardized mask induction with sevoflurane/oxygen and propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg administered intravenously followed by PLMA insertion. Patients were maintained on sevoflurane and N2O.MeasurementsWe measured the differences in end-tidal CO2 (etco2), tidal volume (TV), and respiratory rate (RR) over time between SV, PSV, and PCV. These data were recorded at 5-minute intervals.Main Resultsetco2 (mm Hg) was not significantly higher in the SV vs PSV (P=2.11) and SV vs PCV (P=.24). TV (mL/kg) was significantly lower in SV vs PSV (P<.005) and SV vs PCV (P<.005). RR was not significantly higher in SV vs PSV (P=.43), but was significantly higher in SV vs PCV (P<.005). Three patients in the SV group and 1 patient in the PSV group failed to initiate SV and required PCV and were thus excluded from analysis.ConclusionsAll 3 modes of ventilation using a PLMA were safe in children younger than 1 year. Although we did not observe a statistically significant increase in etco2, differences in TV and RR, and the small but significant incidence of apnea may make PSV or PCV more optimal ventilation strategies in children younger than 1 year when using a PLMA.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.