• Michael Rothman, Mitchell Levy, R Philip Dellinger, Stephen L Jones, Robert L Fogerty, Kirk G Voelker, Barry Gross, Albert Marchetti, and Joseph Beals.
• PeraHealth, Inc, 6302 Fairview Rd, Suite 310, Charlotte, NC, 28203. Electronic address: mrothman@perahealth.com.
• J Crit Care. 2017 Apr 1; 38: 237-244.

PurposeEarly identification and treatment improve outcomes for patients with sepsis. Current screening tools are limited. We present a new approach, recognizing that sepsis patients comprise 2 distinct and unequal populations: patients with sepsis present on admission (85%) and patients who develop sepsis in the hospital (15%) with mortality rates of 12% and 35%, respectively.MethodsModels are developed and tested based on 258 836 adult inpatient records from 4 hospitals. A "present on admission" model identifies patients admitted to a hospital with sepsis, and a "not present on admission" model predicts postadmission onset. Inputs include common clinical measurements and the Rothman Index. Sepsis was determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes.ResultsFor sepsis present on admission, area under the curves ranged from 0.87 to 0.91. Operating points chosen to yield 75% and 50% sensitivity achieve positive predictive values of 17% to 25% and 29% to 40%, respectively. For sepsis not present on admission, at 65% sensitivity, positive predictive values ranged from 10% to 20% across hospitals.ConclusionsThis approach yields good to excellent discriminatory performance among adult inpatients for predicting sepsis present on admission or developed within the hospital and may aid in the timely delivery of care.Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…