-
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Jul 2017
ReviewFifty Years of Research in ARDS. Insight into ARDS - From Models to Patients.
- John G Laffey and Brian P Kavanagh.
- 1 Department of Anesthesia.
- Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017 Jul 1; 196 (1): 18-28.
AbstractClinicians who treat patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) use information and guidance from a wide array of sources, ranging from laboratory experiments, clinical data, health services research, intuition, to personal experience. Each of these sources of information brings unique methodology and information, but each is inherently limited. Because ARDS is a syndrome (and not a disease), the clinician or scientist must take additional care when applying knowledge to individual patients among a group, because patients often do not have identical lung pathophysiology. However, an overwhelming body of knowledge has accumulated in the field from multiple sources. In this review, we describe the nature of some of these sources as they relate to ARDS and review examples of when they have succeeded (and sometimes failed) in shaping practice or advancing knowledge about ARDS.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.