• J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. · Feb 1996

    Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: 4 years of experience from California's newborn screening program.

    • F E Shafer, F Lorey, G C Cunningham, C Klumpp, E Vichinsky, and B Lubin.
    • Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
    • J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 1996 Feb 1; 18 (1): 36-41.

    PurposeIn this article we describe the success of a unique newborn screening program for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies. We will present and discuss 4 years of experience from the California Newborn Hemoglobinopathy Screening Program.MethodsSeveral aspects that ensure the success of the program will be reviewed. These aspects include (a) the use of high-pressure liquid chromatography as the initial screening technique, (b) a confirmatory testing laboratory that incorporates DNA technology and innovative protein analysis using electrospray mass spectrometry, and (c) a complex follow-up strategy that employs regional nurses to track positive results and ensure timely enrollment of infants into treatment systems.ResultsOf these 2 million infants screened, 492 were diagnosed with some form of sickle cell disease; 290 (58.9%) were diagnosed with hemoglobin SS, 143 (29.0%) were diagnosed with hemoglobin SC, and 47 (9.5%) were diagnosed with S beta+thalassemia.ConclusionThe prevalence and ethnicity data presented here demonstrate the ineffectiveness of targeted screening and justify universal screening. Had targeted screening been performed in California during the past 4 years, 58 nonblack infants with sickle cell disease would have gone undiagnosed, and 6,921 nonblack infants with sickle cell trait would not have been identified.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.