• Won-Suh Choi, Jin-Sung Kim, Jung-Woo Hur, and Ji-Hoon Seong.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
• Neurosurgery. 2018 Mar 1; 82 (3): 289-298.

BackgroundIn minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), cage type and position play important roles in fusion achievement and sagittal alignment correction. However, no prospective randomized comparison of the results using different types of cage has been reported to date.ObjectiveTo compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of unilateral MIS-TLIF using 2 types of cage.MethodsAll candidates for single-level MIS-TLIF were randomized into banana-shaped cage and straight-cage groups. Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were used for assessment of cage positions, fusion status, disc height, segmental lordotic angle, cage subsidence, and pelvic parameters. Clinical outcome was assessed using visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores.ResultsForty-four and 40 consecutive patients were operated on using banana-shaped and straight cages, respectively. Cage position was more anterior and lateral in the straight-cage group and more medial and posterior in the banana-shaped cage group. Solid fusion was achieved in 95.2% and 96.6% of the 2 groups, respectively, at 12 mo. The change in disc height and segmental lordotic angle postoperatively was significantly greater in the banana-shaped cage group. The incidence of subsidence during follow-up was significantly higher in the banana-shaped cage group (P < .04). Clinically, the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores decreased significantly after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups.ConclusionOur preliminary outcomes suggest that the subsidence rate may be higher using banana-shaped cages in MIS-TLIF, possibly due to their more medial final position.Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

30 keywords...

hide…