• Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Kapil D Soni, Souvik Maitra, and Dalim K Baidya.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
• J Clin Anesth. 2017 Jun 1; 39: 67-72.

ObjectivesDespite of advancement in intensive care medicine, sepsis and septic shock carry a high mortality. Levosimendan, an inodilator, may be promising for septic shock patients with myocardial dysfunction; however, firm evidence is lacking. In this meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials, levosimendan has been compared with dobutamine in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock.DesignMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.SettingIntensive-care unit.ParticipantsAdult septic shock patients.InterventionAdult septic shock patients received dobutamine or levosimendan.Main Outcome MeasureMortality at longest follow-up, blood lactate level, cardiac index and noradrenaline requirement.ResultsData from 7 randomized trials have been included in this meta-analysis. Levosimendan has no benefit in terms of mortality at longest follow up in comparison to dobutamine (Odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.45, 132; p=0.34) and length of ICU stay (MD -4.7days, 95% CI -10.3, 0.9days, p=0.10). Patients received levosimendan had less blood lactate level (standardized mean difference -0.95; 95% CI -1.64, -0.27; p=0.006) and higher cardiac index (mean difference 0.44; 95% CI 0.17, 0.71; p=0.001). Noradrenaline requirements are similar in both the groups.ConclusionThere is no evidence that levosimendan is superior to dobutamine in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. Further large randomized trials are necessary in this area.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…