• Sjaak Pouwels, Bianca Lascaris, and Simon W Nienhuijs.
• Department of Surgery, St Franciscus & Vlietland, Schiedam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Sjaakpwls@gm... more ail.com. less
• J Clin Anesth. 2017 Jun 1; 39: 89-95.

Study ObjectiveThe present study aimed to validate the Nexfin® monitor and to assess the accuracy compared to classical sphygmomanometry (Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff (RRK)) blood pressure (BP) measurements in patients with obesity scheduled for bariatric surgery.DesignValidation study.SettingOutpatient clinic for bariatric surgery.Patients33 patients scheduled for bariatric surgery.MeasurementsThe validation process was done according to the protocols developed by the European Society of Hypertension from 2010. The Nexfin® monitor (Edwards Lifesciences/BMEYE B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) calculates beat-to-beat blood pressure from finger pulse wave analysis. Measurements of systolic and diastolic BP were obtained using classical sphygmomanometry and the Nexfin® alternatingly.Main ResultsIn total 99 pairs of BP measurements were used. The device failed pass phase 1 as 65 systolic readings fell within 5mmHg (73 required). And 61, 76 and 90 diastolic readings fell within 5, 10 and 15mmHg respectively. Finally, it failed to pass phase 2 as 23 patients for systolic and 25 for diastolic had at least 2/3 of their comparisons falling within 5mmHg (24 required) but 10 subjects for systolic and 8 for diastolic had all three comparisons more than 5mmHg different from the RRK readings (zero allowed). Mean differences were 7.8±6.9mmHg for SBP and 8.0±7.2mmHg for DBP.ConclusionUsing the revised protocol, the Nexfin® device was not able to pass validation. However using the original protocol, the Nexfin® device passed phase 1 and 2.1 of the validation process and failed to pass phase 2.2.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

5 keywords...

hide…