-
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Dec 2017
Practice GuidelineRecommendations for a Standardized Pulmonary Function Report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement.
- Bruce H Culver, Brian L Graham, Allan L Coates, Jack Wanger, Cristine E Berry, Patricia K Clarke, Teal S Hallstrand, John L Hankinson, David A Kaminsky, Neil R MacIntyre, Meredith C McCormack, Margaret Rosenfeld, Sanja Stanojevic, Daniel J Weiner, and ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Pulmonary Function Laboratories.
- Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017 Dec 1; 196 (11): 1463-1472.
BackgroundThe American Thoracic Society committee on Proficiency Standards for Pulmonary Function Laboratories has recognized the need for a standardized reporting format for pulmonary function tests. Although prior documents have offered guidance on the reporting of test data, there is considerable variability in how these results are presented to end users, leading to potential confusion and miscommunication.MethodsA project task force, consisting of the committee as a whole, was approved to develop a new Technical Standard on reporting pulmonary function test results. Three working groups addressed the presentation format, the reference data supporting interpretation of results, and a system for grading quality of test efforts. Each group reviewed relevant literature and wrote drafts that were merged into the final document.ResultsThis document presents a reporting format in test-specific units for spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity that can be assembled into a report appropriate for a laboratory's practice. Recommended reference sources are updated with data for spirometry and diffusing capacity published since prior documents. A grading system is presented to encourage uniformity in the important function of test quality assessment.ConclusionsThe committee believes that wide adoption of these formats and their underlying principles by equipment manufacturers and pulmonary function laboratories can improve the interpretation, communication, and understanding of test results.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.