-
Brain research bulletin · Nov 2002
Comparative StudyLong-Evans rats have a larger cortical topographic representation of movement than Fischer-344 rats: a microstimulation study of motor cortex in naïve and skilled reaching-trained rats.
- Penny M VandenBerg, Theresa M Hogg, Jeffrey A Kleim, and Ian Q Whishaw.
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Canadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Alta, Lethbridge, Canada.
- Brain Res. Bull. 2002 Nov 30; 59 (3): 197-203.
AbstractIntracortical microstimulation of the frontal cortex evokes movements in the contralateral limbs, paws, and digits of placental mammals including the laboratory rat. The topographic representation of movement in the rat consists of a rostral forelimb area (RFA), a caudal forelimb area (CFA), and a hind limb area (HLA). The size of these representations can vary between individual animals and the proportional representation of the body parts within regions can also change as a function of experience. To date, there have been no investigations of strain differences in the cortical map of rats, and this was the objective of the present investigation. The effect of cortical stimulation was compared in young male Long-Evans rats and Fischer-344 rats. The overall size of the motor cortex representation was greater in Long-Evans rats compared to Fischer-344 rats and the threshold required to elicit a movement was higher in the Fischer-344 rats. An additional set of animals were trained in a skilled reaching task to rule out the possibility that experiential differences in the groups could account for the result and to examine the relationship between the differences in topography of cortical movement representations and motor performance. The Long-Evans rats were quantitatively and qualitatively better in skilled reaching than the Fischer-344 rats. Also, Long-Evans rats exhibited a relatively larger area of the topographic representation and lower thresholds for eliciting movement in the contralateral forelimb. This is the first study to describe pronounced strain-related differences in the microstimulation-topographic map of the motor cortex. The results are discussed in relation to using strain differences as a way of examining the behavioral, the physiological, and the anatomical organization of the motor system.Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.