• Arnstein Finset, Lena Heyn, and Cornelia Ruland.
• Department of Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. arnstein.finset@medisin.uio.no
• Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct 1; 93 (1): 80-5.

ObjectiveTo investigate how patient, clinician and relationship characteristics may predict how oncologists and nurses respond to patients' emotional expressions.MethodsObservational study of audiotapes of 196 consultations in cancer care. The consultations were coded according to Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES). Associations were tested in multi-level analyzes.ResultsThere were 471 cues and 109 concerns with a mean number of 3.0 (SD=3.2) cues and concerns per consultation. Nurses in admittance interviews were five times more likely to provide space for further disclosure of cues and concerns (according to VR-CoDES definitions) than oncologists in out-patient follow-up consultations. Oncologists gave more room for disclosure to the first cue or concern in the consultation, to more explicit and doctor initiated cues/concerns and when the doctor and/or patient was female. Nurses gave room for further disclosure to explicit and nurse initiated cues/concerns, but the effects were smaller than for oncologists.ConclusionResponses of clinicians which provide room for further disclosure do not occur at random and are systematically dependent on the source, explicitness and timing of the cue or concern.Practice ImplicationsKnowledge on which factors influence responses to cues and concerns may be useful in communication skills training.Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

26 keywords...

hide…