• Neuroscience · Oct 2018

    Differential effects of extended exercise and memantine treatment on adult neurogenesis in male and female rats.

    • Shaina P Cahill, John Darby Cole, Ru Qi Yu, Jack Clemans-Gibbon, and Jason S Snyder.
    • Department of Psychology, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
    • Neuroscience. 2018 Oct 15; 390: 241-255.

    AbstractAdult neurogenesis has potential to ameliorate a number of disorders that negatively impact the hippocampus, including age-related cognitive decline, depression, and schizophrenia. A number of treatments enhance adult neurogenesis including exercise, NMDA receptor antagonism, antidepressant drugs and environmental enrichment. Despite the chronic nature of many disorders, most animal studies have only examined the efficacy of neurogenic treatments over short timescales (≤1 month). Also, studies of neurogenesis typically include only 1 sex, even though many disorders differentially impact males and females. We tested whether two known neurogenic treatments, running and the NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, could cause sustained increases in neurogenesis in male and female rats. We found that continuous access to a running wheel (cRUN) initially increased neurogenesis, but effects were minimal after 1 month and completely absent after 5 months. Similarly, a single injection of memantine (sMEM) transiently increased neurogenesis before returning to baseline at 1 month. To determine whether neurogenesis could be increased over a 2-month timeframe, we next subjected rats to interval running (iRUN), multiple memantine injections (mMEM), or alternating blocks of iRUN and mMEM. Two months of iRUN increased DCX+ cells in females and iRUN followed by mMEM increased DCX+ cells in males, indicating that neurogenesis was increased in the later stages of the treatments. However, thymidine analogs revealed that neurogenesis was minimally increased during the initial stages of the treatments. These findings highlight temporal limitations and sex differences in the efficacy of neurogenic manipulations, which may be relevant for designing plasticity-promoting treatments.Copyright © 2018 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.