• J Clin Epidemiol · Dec 2017

    Comparative Study

    The new measuring multimorbidity index predicted mortality better than Charlson and Elixhauser indices among the general population.

    • James Stanley and Diana Sarfati.
    • Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand; Biostatistical Group, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: james.stanley@otago.ac.nz.
    • J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1; 92: 99-110.

    ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to develop and validate an updated morbidity index for short-term mortality risk, using chronic conditions identified from routine hospital admission ICD-10 data.Study Design And SettingRetrospective cohort study of all adult New Zealand (NZ) residents at January 1, 2012. Adult NZ residents aged 18 years and over, defined by enrollment with a Primary Healthcare Organisation or accessing public health care in preceding year. Data were split into two data sets for index development (70%, n = 2,331,645) and validation (30%, n = 1,000,166).ResultsThe M3 index was constructed using log hazard ratios for 1-year mortality modeled from presence of 61 chronic conditions. Validation results were improved for the M3 index for predicting 1-year mortality compared to Charlson and Elixhauser on the c-statistic (M3: 0.931, Charlson: 0.921, Elixhauser: 0.922; difference M3 vs. Charlson = 0.010, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.008, 0.012; M3 vs. Elixhauser = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.012) and integrated discriminative improvement (M3 vs. Charlson = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.021, 0.026; M3 vs. Elixhauser = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.022, 0.027).ConclusionThe M3 index had improved predictive performance for 1-year mortality risk over Charlson and Elixhauser indices, allowing better adjustment for mortality risk from chronic conditions. This provides an important tool for population-level analyses of health outcomes.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.